On January 18, Wikipedia was shut down through one day, whole 24 hours to protest about the bill, S.O.P.A to show their response against it. Wikipedia is one of the interactive websites on the Internet, which is very influential to people. CNN interviewed the Wikipedia's co-founder, Jimmy Whales, to know about reason about their first response to United States's politics.
This is the main point, the summary of the interview. Wales had claimed out that Wikipedia were having pressure starting from early December, then they decided to protest against the law. And this decision was made from WIkipedia community, number of 1800. Wales said that this is the first political action and response against the law.
Wales also said about the things that will happen on Wednesday to prepare people. He said "They will found a notice explaining what's going on - explaining our opposition to this and urging them to call their senator or representative," and "We are hoping to really drive a lot of noise in Washington so that people will realize that just listening to Hollywood is no the best idea."
Currently, I know that the vote of consisting or not about the S.O.P.A made a decision about it. They said they won't pass it until there would be a good decision for the two parts of the opinion, agree and disagree. I think this conclusion made a great calmness to both sides, because it's wiser than just passing the bill. Well, my opinion about SOPA is disagree, because I agree about the part that we should protect copyrights but I don't think we should give punishment to the website, because they are a company, and they have a purpose to give information to readers.
Umm.. My opinion about the response of Wikipedia is good. Because it's a kind of campaign without power, and I like the part that other websites also response politically about the bill. Wikipedia made a wise decision about the response about this SOPA bill, and I liked that part that CNN interview Wikipedia's co-founder Wales to know the opinion and part about SOPA of Wikipedia, and made readers to prepare about Wednesday's war against the bill.
This is the main point, the summary of the interview. Wales had claimed out that Wikipedia were having pressure starting from early December, then they decided to protest against the law. And this decision was made from WIkipedia community, number of 1800. Wales said that this is the first political action and response against the law.
Wales also said about the things that will happen on Wednesday to prepare people. He said "They will found a notice explaining what's going on - explaining our opposition to this and urging them to call their senator or representative," and "We are hoping to really drive a lot of noise in Washington so that people will realize that just listening to Hollywood is no the best idea."
Currently, I know that the vote of consisting or not about the S.O.P.A made a decision about it. They said they won't pass it until there would be a good decision for the two parts of the opinion, agree and disagree. I think this conclusion made a great calmness to both sides, because it's wiser than just passing the bill. Well, my opinion about SOPA is disagree, because I agree about the part that we should protect copyrights but I don't think we should give punishment to the website, because they are a company, and they have a purpose to give information to readers.
Umm.. My opinion about the response of Wikipedia is good. Because it's a kind of campaign without power, and I like the part that other websites also response politically about the bill. Wikipedia made a wise decision about the response about this SOPA bill, and I liked that part that CNN interview Wikipedia's co-founder Wales to know the opinion and part about SOPA of Wikipedia, and made readers to prepare about Wednesday's war against the bill.
댓글 없음:
댓글 쓰기